Spaulding v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Karen Spaulding |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2021cv00884 |
| October 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Sally J Berens |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Pam McKimens on behalf of defendant Commissioner of Social Security (McKimens, Pam) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS returned executed on Commissioner of Social Security, Social Security Administration, US Attorney and US Attorney General; service upon defendant, Commissioner of Social Security complete on 10/20/2021, answer due 12/20/2021; Social Security Administration complete on 10/20/2021, answer due 12/20/2021 (McFarland, Joshua) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (mlc) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens (mlc) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (McFarland, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Karen Spaulding (McFarland, Joshua) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Karen Spaulding in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6568985 (McFarland, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
