Molina v. Target Corporation
Bertha Molina |
Target Corporation a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as Target |
1:2022cv00387 |
April 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Jane M Beckering |
Phillip J Green |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT from Ingham County Circuit Court, of receipt of remanded case (ems) |
Filing 11 LETTER, certified copy of remand order and docket sheet sent to Ingham County Circuit Court (ems) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting proposed stipulated order #9 ; limiting damages and remanding the matter back to the Ingham County Circuit Court; signed by District Judge Jane M. Beckering (rmw) |
Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER regarding Limiting Damages and Remanding Matter Back to Circuit Court by defendant Target Corporation (Williams, Kenneth) |
Filing 8 ORDER that Defendant file a corrected answer no later than 7 days from this Order; signed by District Judge Jane M. Beckering (rmw) |
Filing 7 ORDER that Defendant file a corporate disclosure statement no later than 7 days from this Order; signed by District Judge Jane M. Beckering (rmw) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of receipt of case (ems) |
Filing 5 (DISREGARD) NOTICE of receipt of case (ems) Modified text on 5/2/2022 (ems). |
Filing 4 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from Michigan Eastern, their case number 2:22-cv-10858; the documents listed above were electronically transferred to the Western District of Michigan (ems) |
Filing 3 STIPULATED ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Western District of Michigan. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DPer) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 5/2/2022.] |
Filing 2 ORDER for Target Corporation to Show Cause why his case should not be transferred to the Western District of Michigan. Show Cause Response due by 5/2/2022 Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)[Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 5/2/2022.] |
ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses and jury demand (as taken from Notice of Removal #1 , Exhibit 2) by Target Corporation (ems) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Target Corporation from Ingham County Circuit Court, case number 22-0158-NO. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8883045 - Fee: $ 402 [Previously dismissed case: No][Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2) (Williams, Kenneth) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 5/2/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Molina v. Target Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Bertha Molina | |
Represented By: | Brian Elias Muawad |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Target Corporation a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as Target | |
Represented By: | Kenneth P. Williams |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.