Bell-Howell v. United States Postal Service
| Lillian Bell-Howell |
| The United State United States Postal Service and United States Postal Service |
| 1:2022cv00405 |
| May 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Hala Y Jarbou |
| Ray Kent |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS returned executed; All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (Muawad, Brian) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant United States Postal Service, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (mg) |
| Filing 4 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (Muawad, Brian) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Hala Y. Jarbou (mg) |
| SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendant United States Postal Service ; please refer to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i) regarding service on the United States and Its Agencies, Corporations, Officers, or Employees (mg) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Muawad, Brian) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The United State United States Postal Service filed by Lillian Bell-Howell (Muawad, Brian) |
| RECEIPT: in the amount of $402.00, receipt number AMIWDC-6735187; filing fee paid by attorney Brian Elias Muawad on behalf of plaintiff (jmw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
