Brooks #351208 v. Whitmer et al
| Charles Grant Brooks #351208 |
| Gretchen Whitmer, Sirena Landfair, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2, Karmen Bussell, Patricia Lamb, Sara J. Cummins and Unknown St. Charles |
| 1:2022cv00574 |
| June 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ray Kent |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and FOR PAYMENT OF FILING FEE: plaintiff to pay an initial partial fee of $4.33 when funds are available; plaintiff to make interim payments until the full fee is paid; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE to plaintiff regarding assignment of case and consent; statement regarding consent due 7/14/2022 (jjm)
|
|
Copy of Order to Proceed IFP - Initial Fee Due When Funds Are Available - Prisoner, #4 sent via U.S. Mail to Charles Grant Brooks #351208 (jjm)
|
|
Copy of Notice Regarding Assignment of Case and Consent (Prisoner Civil Rights/State Habeas) #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Charles Grant Brooks #351208 (jjm)
|
|
Filing 2
APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents) (jjm)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Charles Grant Brooks #351208 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (jjm)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
