Hernandez Ravelo v. Galanek et al
| Maunel Hernandez Ravelo |
| Adrienne Galanek and Antony Blinken |
| 1:2022cv00869 |
| September 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Jane M Beckering |
| Sally J Berens |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS returned executed on Antony Blinken, Adrienne Galanek, US Attorney and US Attorney General; service upon defendant, Antony Blinken complete on 9/28/2022, answer due 11/28/2022; Adrienne Galanek complete on 9/28/2022, answer due 11/28/2022 (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Antony Blinken (jjm) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants Adrienne Galanek, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (jrg) Modified text on 9/23/2022 (jjm). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Jane M. Beckering (jrg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against Antony Blinken, Adrienne Galanek filed by Maunel Hernandez Ravelo (Attachments: #1 Summons) (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Maunel Hernandez Ravelo in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6849076 (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
