SIP Shine, LLC v. Red Boot Distillery, Inc.
| SIP Shine, LLC |
| Red Boot Distillery, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv00887 |
| September 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Robert J Jonker |
| Ray Kent |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL of case filed by plaintiff SIP Shine, LLC (Donnell, Douglas) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting STIPULATION #10 ; signed by Judge Robert J. Jonker (elam)
|
| Filing 10 PROPOSED STIPULATION and ORDER Stipulation and Order for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint by defendant Red Boot Distillery, Inc. (Glazier, Bradley) |
|
Filing 9
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiff Sip Shine, LLC to show cause by 10/28/2022; signed by Judge Robert J. Jonker (elam)
|
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Bradley K. Glazier on behalf of defendant Red Boot Distillery, Inc. (Glazier, Bradley) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Robert Michael Howard on behalf of defendant Red Boot Distillery, Inc. (Howard, Robert) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE TO #6 Order to Show Cause - Supplemental filed by plaintiff SIP Shine, LLC (Donnell, Douglas) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE #6 by SIP Shine, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Plaintiff's Response to Order to Show Cause, #2 Exhibit B to Plaintiff's Response to Order to Show Cause, #3 Exhibit C to Plaintiff's Response to Order to Show Cause) (Donnell, Douglas) Modified text on 10/17/2022; wrong CM/ECF event used by attorney (ns). |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: to show cause by 10/18/2022; signed by Judge Robert J. Jonker (elam)
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS returned executed; Red Boot Distillery, Inc. served on 10/3/2022, answer due 10/24/2022 (Donnell, Douglas) Modified text on 10/4/2022 (ems). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Red Boot Distillery, Inc. (ems) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Robert J. Jonker (ems) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by SIP Shine, LLC (Donnell, Douglas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand (with Exhibits A-D) against All Defendants filed by SIP Shine, LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons for Red Boot Distillery) (Donnell, Douglas) Modified text on 9/26/2022 (ems). |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff SIP Shine, LLC in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6853594 (Donnell, Douglas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SIP Shine, LLC v. Red Boot Distillery, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: SIP Shine, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Douglas A. Donnell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Red Boot Distillery, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Bradley K. Glazier |
| Represented By: | Robert Michael Howard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
