Wray v. Commissioner of Social Security
Michael D Wray and Michael Wray |
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security |
Kansas City Region Social Security Administration |
1:2023cv00225 |
March 3, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Sally J Berens |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Meghan Jane McEvoy on behalf of defendant Commissioner of Social Security (McEvoy, Meghan) |
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Michael Wray in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-7004204 (Bui, Crystal) |
Filing 4 ORDER denying plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis; directing plaintiff to pay $402 filing fee within 28 days; signed by Chief Judge Hala Y. Jarbou (aks) |
Filing 3 NOTICE regarding transmission of complaint, service and answer; that this case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens (mg) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (Attachments: #1 Attachment) (Bui, Crystal) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration filed by Michael D Wray (Bui, Crystal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.