Hunt v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff: John E. Hunt
Defendant: Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service and United States of America
Case Number: 1:2023cv00479
Filed: May 9, 2023
Court: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Ray Kent
Referring Judge: Paul L Maloney
Nature of Suit: Taxes
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 unopposed motion for extension of time to answer; defendant USA's answer is due 10/10/2023; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw)
July 7, 2023 Copy of Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #6 sent via U.S. Mail to John E. Hunt (mg)
July 5, 2023 Filing 5 UNOPPOSED MOTION for extension of time to file answer re #1 by defendant United States of America; (Parke, Kimberly)
July 3, 2023 (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Kimberly Parke on behalf of defendant United States of America ; party United States of America added (Parke, Kimberly)
May 16, 2023 Copy of Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge #4 sent via U.S. Mail to John E. Hunt (mg)
May 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Ray Kent; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)
May 15, 2023 Filing 3 SUMMONS returned executed on Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, US Attorney and US Attorney General; service upon defendant, Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service complete on 5/10/2023, answer due 7/10/2023 (mg)
May 11, 2023 RECEIPT: in the amount of $402.00, receipt number 500000051; for filing fee (jrg)
May 11, 2023 Copy of Receipt of Case Notice #2 sent via U.S. Mail to John E. Hunt (jrg)
May 9, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of receipt of case (jrg)
May 9, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service filed by John E. Hunt (Attachments: #1 Letter of Authority, #2 Client Status History 2021, #3 Form 1041 2021, #4 Retirement Account Tax Statement 2021, #5 IRS Letter December 2021, #6 Letter to IRS March 2022, #7 IRS Letter June 2022, #8 IRS Letter October 2022, #9 IRS Reply Letter November 2022, #10 Letter to IRS January 2023) (jrg)
May 9, 2023 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (jrg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hunt v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John E. Hunt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: Kimberly Parke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?