Busby v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
| Douglas Busby |
| Tennessee Department of Corrections, Bledsoe County Correctional Complex and Unknown Aponte |
| 1:2024cv00808 |
| August 6, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Sally J Berens |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENT from Eastern District of Tennessee, of receipt of WDMI transfer case, assigning case number 1:24-cv-285 (mlc) |
| CASE ELECTRONICALLY TRANSFERRED to Eastern District of Tennessee (mlc) |
| Copy of Order Transferring Case to Other District #4 sent via U.S. Mail to Douglas Busby #215141 (mlc) |
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Eastern District of Tennessee; signed by Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens (jln)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of receipt of case (mlc) |
| Copy of Receipt of Case Notice #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Douglas Busby #215141 (mlc) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by plaintiff Douglas Busby; (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents) (mlc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Douglas Busby (mlc) |
| STATEMENT RE CONSENT (as taken from #1 ) by plaintiff Douglas Busby consenting to proceed before the Magistrate Judge (mlc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
