Sanford v. Commissioner of Social Security
Tina J. Sanford |
Commissioner of Social Security |
Social Security Administration |
1:2025cv00096 |
January 24, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Ray Kent |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Francis David Tankard on behalf of defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Tankard, Francis) |
![]() |
Filing 3 NOTICE regarding transmission of complaint, service and answer; that this case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (ns) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (Forbes, Randal) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT to Review the Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Tina J Sanford (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons) (Forbes, Randal) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Randal Scott Forbes on behalf of plaintiff Tina J Sanford (Forbes, Randal) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Jason Scott Rodman on behalf of plaintiff Tina J Sanford (Rodman, Jason) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Ann E. Young on behalf of plaintiff Tina J Sanford (Young, Ann) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.