Heard #252329 v. Caruso et al
| 2:2005cv00231 |
| September 23, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Northern Division (2) Office |
| Magistrate Judge Timothy P. Greeley |
| Judge Gordon J. Quist |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
427
OPINION AND JUDGMENT; signed by Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney (Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, aeb)
|
|
Filing
410
OPINION; signed by Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney (Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)
|
|
Filing
387
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 349 , denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 299 ; signed by Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney (Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)
|
|
Filing
386
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 348 ; signed by Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney (Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, aeb)
|
|
Filing
347
ORDER denying 344 motion to alter or amend judgment; signed by Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney (Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, aeb)
|
|
Filing
341
ORDER denying appeals of orders of Magistrate Judge; signed by Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney (Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, aeb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Heard #252329 v. Caruso et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
