Mays #218101 v. Hemmila et al
| Marcus D. Mays #218101 |
| Kevin Hemmila, Michael Minerick, Noah Bessley, Jessie Niemi, Jessie Sholden, Unknown Naglee, Michael Waltanen, Jason Bessner, Rick Wartanen, Tom LaPlante, Chung Oh, Nancy Hulkoff and Sergel Casper |
| 2:2015cv00154 |
| October 29, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Northern Division (2) Office |
| Baraga |
| Timothy P. Greeley |
| Gordon J. Quist |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
197
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 193 re 166 , 165 : MDOC Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 166 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; Defendant Oh's Motion for Summary Judgment 165 is DENIED; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt)
|
|
Filing
138
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 137 re 131 : Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order 131 is DENIED; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt)
|
|
Filing
134
ORDER ADOPTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 125 re 92 : Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 92 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 83 re 74 , 32 , 72 , 37 ; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
