White #770741 v. Horton
| Christopher Lawrence White #770741 |
| Connie Horton |
| 2:2019cv00249 |
| December 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Paul L Maloney |
| Maarten Vermaat |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE by petitioner Christopher Lawrence White #770741 re Brief (Related Document) #12 (mlc) |
| Filing 12 BRIEF by petitioner Christopher Lawrence White #770741 re #1 ("Memorandum in Support") (mlc) |
| RECEIPT: filing fee in the amount of $ 5.00, receipt number MQ006069 (slk) |
| Filing 11 LETTER from petitioner Christopher Lawrence White #770741 regarding status of case; with proof of service (mailed docket sheet) (slk) |
Filing 10
ORDER DENYING IFP: petitioner to pay the entire fee of $ 5.00 within 28 days or the case will be dismissed;(filing fee to be submitted by 1/31/2020); signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)
|
| Copy of Order Denying IFP (Able to Pay - Habeas) #10 sent via U.S. Mail to Christopher Lawrence White (slk) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER denying #5 motion for hearing ; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat, rbk)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER denying #6 motion to appoint counsel ; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam)
|
| Copy of Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel #8 , Order on Motion for Hearing #9 sent via U.S. Mail to Christopher Lawrence White (mlc) |
| Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE by petitioner Christopher Lawrence White #770741 re MOTION to appoint counsel #6 , MOTION for hearing (evidentiary) #5 (slk) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to appoint counsel by petitioner Christopher Lawrence White #770741; (slk) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for hearing (evidentiary) by petitioner Christopher Lawrence White #770741; (slk) |
| Filing 4 LETTER from petitioner Christopher Lawrence White #770741 requesting docket sheet; (mailed docket sheet) (slk) |
| Filing 3 PROOF OF SERVICE by petitioner Christopher Lawrence White #770741 re MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 , Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #1 (slk) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by petitioner Christopher Lawrence White #770741; (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents, #2 Application to Proceed) (slk) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Christopher Lawrence White #770741 (Attachments: #1 Miscellaneous Exhibits) (slk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: White #770741 v. Horton | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Christopher Lawrence White #770741 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Connie Horton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
