Stevens v. Braselton
Plaintiff: P.J. Stevens
Defendant: Debra J. Braselton
Case Number: 0:2007cv00626
Filed: January 29, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Mille Lacs
Presiding Judge: Raymond L. Erickson
Presiding Judge: Richard H. Kyle
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 5, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 1. That the Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 2 be denied, as moot. 2. That this action be summarily dismissed pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii). Objections to R&R due by 2/23/2007. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson on 02/05/2007. (jc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stevens v. Braselton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: P.J. Stevens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Debra J. Braselton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?