United States of America v. Norlem et al
| United States of America |
| Charles B. Norlem, Midland Mortgage, Lisa M. Aspelin, Minnesota, State of and Minnesota Department of Revenue |
| 0:2007cv04799 |
| December 10, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Hennepin |
| Franklin L. Noel |
| John R. Tunheim |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 83 , Motion for Summary Judgment filed by United States of America 40 is DENIED.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on October 14, 2009. (HAM)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER re 85 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by United States of America. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint against the State of Minnesota is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on September 15, 2009. (HAM)
|
|
Filing
83
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that United States Motion for Summary Judgment 40 be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 9/16/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel on 9/2/09. (jam)
|
|
Filing
81
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment As To Lisa Aspelin By United States Of America 68 be GRANTED. Objections to R&R due by 9/8/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel on 8/21/09. (jam)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
