Peroceski v. Tarr et al
| Timothy Peroceski |
| Robert Tarr, St. Louis County Sheriff's Dept., Ryan Riley and Hibbing Police Dept., City of |
| 0:2008cv00333 |
| February 7, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| St. Louis |
| Mayeron |
| Tunheim |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER granting defendants Tarr and St. Louis County Sheriff's Department's 33 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting defendants Riley and City of Hibbing Police Department's 40 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying plaintiff's 51 Motion for Summary Judgment; Adopting Magistrate Judge's 61 Report and Recommendation. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on September 30, 2009. (DML)
|
|
Filing
61
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT: 1. The Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 33) by Defendants Robert Tarr and the St. Louis County Sheriff's Department be GRANTED; 2. The Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 40) by Defendants Ryan Riley and th e City of Hibbing Police Departement be GRANTED; 3. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 51) be DENIED; and 4. This action be DISMISSED with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 1/26/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes on 1/9/09. (jam)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
