Galarnyk v. Fraser et al
| Timothy Galarnyk |
| Tom Fraser, Unknown Supervisor of Captain Tom Fraser,, Mike Martin, Unknown Minneapolis Police Officers, Hennepin County, Unknown Minnesota State Patrol/Troopers and Minneapolis, City of |
| 0:2008cv03351 |
| June 27, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Boylan |
| Rosenbaum |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
114
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting defendants' 78 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting defendants' 80 Motion for Summary Judgment (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on August 22, 2011. (DML)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER ADOPTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 36 Report and Recommendation, granting in part and denying in part 18 Motion to Dismiss filed by Unknown Supervisor of Captain Tom Fraser, Tom Fraser, Unknown Minnesota State Patrol/Troopers. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge James M. Rosenbaum on 09/08/2009. (kmc)
|
|
Filing
36
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 18 MOTION to Dismiss or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment filed by Unknown Supervisor of Captain Tom Fraser, Tom Fraser, Unknown Minnesota State Patrol/Troopers be granted in part and denied in part. Objections to R&R due by 7/10/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan on 6/25/09. (JME)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
