Minneapolis Firefighters' Relief Association v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
Minneapolis Firefighters' Relief Association |
Medtronic, Inc., William A Hawkins, III and Gary Elliss |
0:2008cv06324 |
December 10, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Hennepin |
Boylan |
Magnuson |
Securities/Commodities |
15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 359 ORDER granting 355 Motion for Approval of Distribution Plan and providing for distribution of settlement proceeds (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Paul A. Magnuson on February 24, 2015. (ALT) |
Filing 57 Order Adopting the Report and Recommendation 54 ; Denying as moot the Motion by the Iron Workers pursuant to stipulation 16 ; Granting the Motion of the Institutional Investor Group for Appointment as Lead Plaintiffs 20 ; Denying the City of Los Angeles' Motion for Appointment as Lead Plaintiff 24 ; Granting the Motion of Medtronic Institutional Investor Group for Appointment as Lead Plaintiff 29 . (Written Opinion) Signed by Senior Judge Paul A. Magnuson on 05/26/2009. (LM) |
Filing 54 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to grant 20 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, to deny as moot 16 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, to deny 24 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, to grant 29 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. See Report and Recommendation for details. Objections to R&R due by 5/8/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan on 4/24/09. (kt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.