Allen v. Jussila et al
| Lucius R. Allen |
| Joshua B Colton, Nanette Larson, Mark Thielen, Michael Koeplin, John Agrimson, Kathy Reid, Stephen Graane, B. J. Helmaniak, Judy Ellerbush, Barb Nelson, Tagawa, Teresa Jonk, Karen Jussila and Jessica Simms |
| 0:2008cv06366 |
| December 15, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Ericksen |
| Mayeron |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
153
ORDER : IT IS ORDERED THAT:1.The prison officials at the institution where Allen is incarcerated shall pay the $22.50 initial partial appellate filing fee from Allens account to the Clerk of Court.2.The prison officials at the institution where Allen is incarcerated shall pay the remaining balance of Allens appellate filing fees, $432.50, from Allens account to the Clerk of Court in the manner prescribed by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).3.Allens application to proceed on appeal IFP [Dock et No. 152] is GRANTED.4.The Clerk of Court shall send copies of this Order to Allen, to the prison officials at the institution where Allen is incarcerated, and to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.(Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on January 19, 2011. (slf)
|
|
Filing
139
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 137 : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:1.The Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment of Defendants Agrimson, Helmaniak, Jonk, Larson, Nelson, Reid, Simms, Tagawa, and Thielen [Docket No. 46] is GRANTED; the acti on against these defendants is dismissed with prejudice;2.Defendant Stephen Craane, M.D.s Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 55], is GRANTED; the action against this defendant is dismissed with prejudice; and3.Defendants Dr. Michael Koeplin and Dr. Joshua Coltons Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 61] is GRANTED; the action against these defendants is dismissed with prejudice.LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on September 1, 2010. (slf)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS.IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:1.Defendant Karen Jussilas Motion to Dismiss, Alternatively for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 21] be GRANTED; and2.Plaintiffs Complaint with regard to Defendant Karen Jussila be DISMI SSED WITH PREJUDICE; and3.Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment Against Judy Ellerbusch for Failure to File an Answer to Plaintiffs Complaint and, for Entry of Default [Docket No. 75] be DENIED.4.Defendant Judy Ellerbusch be DISMISSED from the suit WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on March 2, 2010. (slf)
|
|
Filing
98
DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 95 and denying 75 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Lucius R. Allen,and granting 21 Motion to Dismiss filed by Karen Jussila. Plaintiff's Complaint with regard to De fendant Karen Jussila is dismissed with prejudice. Defendant Judy Ellerbusch is dismissed without prejudice (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on March 1, 2010. (slf) Modified on 3/2/2010 (TSS). (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/2/2010: # 1 Main Document)Modified on 3/2/2010 (TSS).
|
|
Filing
95
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 1. Defendant Karen Jussila's Motion to Dismiss, Alternatively for Summary Judgment 21 be GRANTED; and 2. Plaintiff's Complaint with regard to Defendant Karen Jussila be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and3. Plaintiff&# 039;s Motion for Default Judgment Against Judy Ellerbusch for Failure to File an Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint and, for Entry of Default 75 be DENIED. 4. Defendant Judy Ellerbusch be DISMISSED from the suit WITHOUTPREJUDICE. Objections to R&R due by 2/26/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron on 2/12/10. (VEM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
