Kademani v. Mayo Clinic et al
| Deepak Kademani |
| John or Jane Doe, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation |
| 0:2009cv00219 |
| January 30, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Hennepin |
| Noel |
| Tunheim |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
529
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying defendant's 445 Motion for Relief from Judgment (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on December 3, 2012. (DML)
|
|
Filing
494
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER overruling re 406 APPEAL/OBJECTION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Judge filed by Mayo Clinic; affirming Magistrate Jude's 394 Order on Motion for Protective Order (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on November 29, 2012. (DML)
|
|
Filing
304
ORDER granting defendant Mayo Clinic's 229 Amended Motion in Limine to Exclude Argument that the Separation Agreement be Construed Against Mayo (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on May 21, 2012. (DML)
|
|
Filing
278
ORDER granting in part and denying in part defendants' 227 Motion to Exclude Protected Health Information and Evidence Regarding Whether Peer Review was Justified or Properly Conducted; granting plaintiff's 192 Motion to Exclude Dr. Arce From Testifying at Trial (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on May 16, 2012. (DML)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
