Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research et al. v. Elkin, M.D.
| Mayo Clinic, Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research and Cerner Corporation |
| Peter L. Elkin, M.D. |
| Peter L. Elkin, M.D. |
| Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research, Mayo Clinic and Cerner Corporation |
| 0:2009cv00322 |
| February 11, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Olmsted |
| Doty |
| Keyes |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
413
ORDER Granting Plaintiffs' Request for Attorneys' Fees(Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 8/24/2011. (PJM)
|
|
Filing
271
ORDER granting Cerner's motion to dismiss as to counterclaims 79(c) and (e) and denying as to counterclaims 79(a) and (b). Granting Cerner's motion to dismiss on counterclaim 79(d) re 192 Motion to Dismiss; granting 226 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 231 Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony; granting 236 Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony (Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 12/27/2010. (PJM)
|
|
Filing
164
ORDER granting with respect to plaintiffs' common law trade secret misappropriation claim and and denying in all other respects 44 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 117 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 03/04/2010. (PJM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
