EFH Co. v. North Central States Regional Council of Carpenters
Plaintiff: EFH Co.
Defendant: North Central States Regional Council of Carpenters
Case Number: 0:2009cv01095
Filed: May 11, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Dakota
Presiding Judge: Keyes
Presiding Judge: Magnuson
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 29:185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Paul A. Magnuson on May 26, 2010. (smr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: EFH Co. v. North Central States Regional Council of Carpenters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EFH Co.
Represented By: Steven C Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: North Central States Regional Council of Carpenters
Represented By: Burt A Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?