McCaster v. County of Ramsey et al
| Marchello McCaster |
| John Doe, Richard Roe, Colette Thill, Patti Vodinlich, Al Carlson, Julie Nelson, Jeanne Schumaker, Nancy Mattson, Mary Clausen, Brian Loeffelholz, Audrey Darling, Jeff Allen, County of Ramsey and Kristin Nelson |
| 0:2009cv03196 |
| November 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Ramsey |
| Erickson |
| Kyle |
| Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
101
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 82 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 07/11/11. (kll)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER dismissing with prejudice Defendants Colette Thill adn Jeanne Schumacher re 78 Stipulation. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 12/8/10. (kll)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE Count Four of Plaintiffs Complaint re 75 Stipulation of Dismissal. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 12/06/10. (kll)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER Dismissing with Prejudice Defendant Kristin Nelson re 24 Stipulation. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 03/09/10. (kll)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE Defendant Brian Loeffelholz and amending case caption re 22 Stipulation. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 03/03/10. (kll)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
