Wilson v. Astrue et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 9, 2012
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) is GRANTED. 2. Counsel Ethel J. Schaen and Thomas A. Krause are awarded attorney fees in the amount of $16,248.0 0. 3. Counsel Ethel J. Schaen and Thomas A. Krause will refund to Plaintiff attorney fees in the amount of $4,874.84, which recovered under the Equal Access to Justice Act. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 1/8/12. (GRR)
|September 15, 2011
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 33 Report and Recommendation (Written Opinion). Based upon the Report and Recommendation of United States MagistrateJudge Arthur J. Boylan, no objections filed in this matter, and after an independen treview of the files, records and proceedings in the above-titled matter, IT IS ORDEREDthat Wilson be awarded attorney fees in the amount of $4,874.84, pursuant to the EqualAccess to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. 28 .Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 9/15/11. (KMW)
|March 16, 2011
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 22 Report and Recommendation. (Written Opinion). The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judges Report andRecommendation dated February 11, 2011 22 . Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment 11 is GRANTED and the order of the Administrative Law Judge isREVERSED. Commissioners Motion for Summary Judgment 17 is DENIED.Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff, thereby granting her benefits. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 3/16/11. (KMW)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?