Otis v. Berge et al
William H. Otis |
Harold A. Berge, Rose M. Berge, Cindy Lou Berge, Phillip R. Burkholder, Steven Corson and Others Unnamed at this time |
0:2010cv02155 |
May 27, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Joan N. Ericksen |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 77 ORDER : IT IS ORDERED THAT:1.The Court certifies that Otiss appeal is not taken in good faith.2.Otiss motion for in forma pauperis status on appeal [Docket No. 76] is DENIED.(Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on July 18, 2011. (slf) |
Filing 72 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 70 . IT IS ORDERED THAT:1.Plaintiffs claims against Philip Burkholder are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.2.Defendant Philip Burkholders motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 53] is GRANTED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on May 23, 2011. (slf) |
Filing 60 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : IT IS ORDERED THAT:1.Defendants motions to dismiss [Docket Nos. 10 and 39] are GRANTED. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on December 23, 2010. (slf) |
Filing 46 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Harold A. Berge, Rose M. Berge, Cindy Lou Berge should be GRANTED, 39 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Steven Corson should be GRANTED. Objections to R&R due by 11/29/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes on 11/15/10. (akl) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.