Harrison v. Fabian
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Ray Harrison
Defendant: Joan Fabian
Case Number: 0:2010cv04335
Filed: October 22, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Anoka
Presiding Judge: Susan R. Nelson
Presiding Judge: John R. Tunheim
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9 . 1. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, [Docket No. 1], is DENIED; 2. Petitioner's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, [Docket No. 4], is DENIED; 3. This action is summarily DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on February 1, 2011. (HAM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harrison v. Fabian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Ray Harrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joan Fabian
Represented By: Matthew Frank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?