BBY Solutions, Inc. et al v. Karreman et al
| BBY Solutions, Inc., Best Buy Stores, L.P. and Bestbuy.com, LLC |
| Karrie-Lee Karreman, Elsie Madeleine Pitre, Stewart Fotheringham and 2182273 Ontario, Inc. |
| 0:2010cv04726 |
| November 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Hennepin |
| Arthur J. Boylan |
| Michael J. Davis |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 85 Report and Recommendation(Written Opinion). IT IS ORDERED: Defendants are found liable under each count of the Complaint; Defendants and all those acting in concert with them are enjoined from fur ther false advertising, infringement and dilution of Plaintiffs' federally registered trademarks; Plaintiffs are awarded damages pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d) in the amount of $25,000.00; Plaintiffs are awarded $10,383.35 in rea sonable fees and costs incurred in connection with Plaintiffs' Motion for default and depositions for which Defendants failed to appear; and Plaintiffs are awarded reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $48,934.89. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 9/11/13. (KMW)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 70 Report and Recommendation (Written Opinion). Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of Default Judgment 63 is GRANTED; and The Court awards to Plaintiffs attorneys' fees and costs incurred in preparing for the depositions and the preparation and filing of this Motion. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 10/26/12. (KMW)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiffs' Corrected Motion Under Rule 37(B)(2)(A)(Vi) for Entry of Default Judgment Against Defendants or In the Alternative Motion to Compel Discovery 38 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART a s follows: a. Plaintiffs' request for entry of default is denied. b. Plaintiffs' request for an order compelling production is granted as follows: i. Within 14 days of the date of the Order on this Report and Recommendation, De fendants are ordered to provide complete, accurate, and nonprivileged information responsive to Plaintiffs First Set of Interrogatories and First Set of Requests for Production. ii. Within 14 days of the date of the Order on this Report and Recommen dation, Defendants pay to Plaintiffs $2,500 as reasonable fees and expenses for bringing the present motion. iii. Defendants are warned that any future violation of any court order or applicable rule in this matter will result in an entr y of default, and/or any other sanction, that the court deems appropriate. 2. Stipulation to Amend Pretrial Scheduling Order is GRANTED, and the matter is referred back to the undersigned magistrate judge for determination of appropriate deadlines and entry of an amended pretrial scheduling order consistent with the interests of securing a just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this action. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 5/10/12. (GRR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
