Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford v. Raske et al
| Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford |
| Melinda Sue Raske and Kevin A Raske |
| 0:2011cv00381 |
| February 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Paul A. Magnuson |
| Franklin L. Noel |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Pltf's 5 Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED; 2. Default shall be entered against Defts Melinda Sue Raske and Kevin A. Raske under F.R.C.P.55(a); 3. Default shall be entered against Defts Melinda Sue Raske and Kevin A. Raske under F.R.C.P. 55(b)(2); 4. Neither Melinda Sue Raske nor Kevin A. Raske is entitled to coverge or a defense from Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford for any of the claims in the lawsuit captioned Degborah Creech and H ollis Ann Sanders v. Melinda Sue Raske and Kevin Raske and Lydaa Agatha Gusa a/k/a Gaye Gusa, Case No. 562009CA003919, (St. Lucie County, FL) (The "Creech" Lawsuit"); and 5. Neither Melinda Sue Raske nor Kevin A. Raske is entitled to indeminity from Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford for any damages for which they may be held liable in connection with the Creech Lawsuit. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Signed by Judge Paul A. Magnuson on July 21, 2011. (smr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
