Northeast Bank v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
| Northeast Bank |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Hanover Insurance Group, The |
| 0:2011cv03233 |
| November 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Hennepin |
| Joan N. Ericksen |
| Jeanne J. Graham |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
124
ORDER: Northeast Bank's Motion to Reopen and Enter Final Judgment 116 is GRANTED. Counts II and III of Northeast Bank's Second Amended Complaint are DISMISSED with prejudice. Northeast Bank recovers from Wells Fargo Bank $461,821. 92, which is the amount payable on the two converted checks and prejudgment interest. Northeast Bank recovers from Wells Fargo Bank postjudgment interest according to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on May 29, 2014. (CBC)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER: Northeast Bank's Motion for Summary Judgment 77 is GRANTED. Wells Fargo Bank's Motion for Summary Judgment 84 is DENIED. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on January 16, 2014. (CBC)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER : IT IS ORDERED THAT:1.Hanovers motion to dismiss Counts II and III of the Second Amended Complaint [Docket No. 42] is GRANTED.2.Counts II and III of the Second Amended Complaint are DISMISSED.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on July 9, 2012. (slf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
