American Institute of Physics et al v. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. et al
| American Institute of Physics and John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
| Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. and John Doe Nos. 1-10 |
| 0:2012cv00528 |
| February 29, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Jeffrey J. Keyes |
| Richard H. Kyle |
| Copyrights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
255
ORDER Adopting 250 Report and Recommendation; overruling 252 Objections; denying as moot 93 Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 116 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying as moot 153 Motion for Summary Judgment ; granting 156 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 160 Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony; denying as moot 190 Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony; denying as moot 222 Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony; dismissing with prejudice 41 Amended Complaint. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 08/30/13. (KLL)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER granting 23 Motion to Intervene. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 07/11/12. (kll)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER CANCELING the June 27, 2012 hearing on 11 MOTION to Dismiss. The Motion is deemed submitted as of Juen 13, 2012. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 06/19/12. (kll)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
