Mervil v. United States of America - FTCA et al
Elainaise Mervil |
Donald Collins, Matthew Levisay, United States of America - FTCA, Nicole English, Sandra Lauring and Mary Ellen Rivers-Graham |
0:2012cv01581 |
June 29, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Waseca |
Arthur J. Boylan |
David S. Doty |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 95 ORDER staying further proceedings in this matter pending resolution of appeal to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.(Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 12/13/2014. (PJM) CC: Mervil. (kt) |
Filing 88 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Granting 48 Motion to Dismiss/General filed by Donald Collins, Nicole Engisch, Sandra Lauring, United States of America - FTCA, Mary Ellen Rivers-Graham, Matthew Levisay; Adopting 86 Report and Recommendation. (Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 1/24/2014. (PJM) |
Filing 86 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the defendants' Motion to Dismiss be granted [Docket No. 48] and that plaintiff Elainaise Mervil's complaint alleging FTCA claims against the United States, as well as claims against all of the individually named defendants for violation of civil rights under Bivens v. Six Unnamed Federal Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), be dismissed with prejudice [Docket No. 1]. Objections to R&R due by 1/21/2014. Signed by Chief Mag. Judge Arthur J. Boylan on 1/6/14. cc: Elainaise Mervil(jam) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.