Fargas v. United States of America et al
| Luis Fargas |
| Richard Sletten, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Anderson, Miller, Vavra, Smith and United States of America |
| 0:2012cv02165 |
| August 29, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Olmsted |
| Janie S. Mayeron |
| John R. Tunheim |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 55 Motion to Reconsider ; granting 57 Application for Permission to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on January 2, 2014. (DML) cc: Luis Fargas. Modified on 1/2/2014 (lmb).
|
|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting plaintiff's 42 Motion for Waiver of Noncompliance; granting plaintiff's 46 Motion to Submit Exhibits on the Record; adopt Magistrate Judge's 48 Report and Recommendation; granting defendants' 23 Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on September 23, 2013. (DML) cc: Luis Fargas. Modified on 9/23/2013 (lmb).
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 5 Report and Recommendation, that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Richard Sletten are summarily DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).(Written Opinion) Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on October 11, 2012. (jam) cc: Luis Fargas. Modified on 10/12/2012 (lmb).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
