Snyder v. Astrue

Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff: Jodi Lee Snyder
Case Number: 0:2012cv03104
Filed: December 13, 2012
Court: Minnesota District Court
County: Dakota
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Davis
Referring Judge: Jeffrey J. Keyes
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 18, 2013 22 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 18 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:1.Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 9 , is DENIED; 2.Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 15 , is GRANTED; and3.This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.(Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 11/18/13. (GRR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Snyder v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By: Gregory G Brooker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jodi Lee Snyder
Represented By: Neut L Strandemo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.