Papesh v. Colvin

Plaintiff: Kathleen J. Papesh
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 0:2013cv00161
Filed: January 18, 2013
Court: Minnesota District Court
County: Stearns
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Davis
Referring Judge: Jeanne J. Graham
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 3, 2015 34 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 32 Report and Recommendation (Written Opinion). Pursuant to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals Judgment of May 27, 2015, 26 , this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedingsconsistent with the opinion of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 9/3/15. (KMW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Papesh v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathleen J. Papesh
Represented By: Edward C Olson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: Ana H Voss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?