Witthuhn v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC et al
| Douglas Witthuhn |
| Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, All other persons, unknown claiming any right, title, estate, interest, or lien in the real estate described in the complaint herein, Aurora Bank, FSB, Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. and MERSCORP Inc. |
| 0:2013cv00680 |
| March 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Anoka |
| Joan N. Ericksen |
| Franklin L. Noel |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 69 - Nationstar Mortgage's motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, to dismiss for failure to prosecute 52 is GRANTED to the extent Nationstar Mortgage seeks dismissal for failure to prosecute. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on August 26, 2014. (CBC)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER: Defendants' motion to dismiss 15 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. In accordance with the Administrative Order dated June 19, 2013, all dispositive and non-dispositive motions filed in this case on or after the date of this Order are referred to the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A)-(C). (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on June 20, 2013. (CBC)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER denying 7 Motion for TRO. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on April 3, 2013. (CBC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
