Walz v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
Plaintiff: Marissa Walz
Defendant: Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2013cv00779
Filed: April 4, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
County: Hennepin
Presiding Judge: Steven E. Rau
Presiding Judge: Richard H. Kyle
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER granting 50 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing 1 Complaint with prejudice. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 05/22/14. (KLL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walz v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marissa Walz
Represented By: Mark A Greenman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
Represented By: Christopher A Amundsen
Represented By: Melissa Raphan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?