Walz v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
Marissa Walz |
Ameriprise Financial, Inc. |
0:2013cv00779 |
April 4, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Hennepin |
Steven E. Rau |
Richard H. Kyle |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 66 ORDER granting 50 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing 1 Complaint with prejudice. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 05/22/14. (KLL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Walz v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Marissa Walz | |
Represented By: | Mark A Greenman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Christopher A Amundsen |
Represented By: | Melissa Raphan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.