Haase v. Colvin et al

Plaintiff: Stuart L. Haase
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 0:2013cv00920
Filed: April 22, 2013
Court: Minnesota District Court
County: Hennepin
Referring Judge: Leo I. Brisbois
Presiding Judge: Patrick J. Schiltz
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 16, 2013 20 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 19 . IT IS ORDERED: 1. That the parties' Stipulation for Remand, 18 , is GRANTED, and that this case be REMANDED to the Social Security Administration; and 2. That this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on December 16, 2013. (CLG) cc: Stuart L. Haase on 12/16/2013 (MMP).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haase v. Colvin et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stuart L. Haase
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: Ana H Voss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?