Chavira v. Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc.

Plaintiff: James Chavira
Defendant: Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2013cv01734
Filed: July 3, 2013
Court: Minnesota District Court
County: Rice
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Davis
Referring Judge: Steven E. Rau
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 18, 2015 45 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment 22 is GRANTED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 8/18/15. (GRR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chavira v. Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Chavira
Represented By: Christopher D Jozwiak
Represented By: Joni M Thome
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc.
Represented By: Ashlee M Bekish
Represented By: Cynthia A Bremer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?