United States of America v. Wadner
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Polynice Wadner
Case Number: 0:2013cv03159
Filed: November 18, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Olmsted
Presiding Judge: Paul A. Magnuson
Presiding Judge: Franklin L. Noel
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 4245
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 11 Report and Recommendation (Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge Paul A. Magnuson on March 6, 2014. (JC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Wadner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Bahram Samie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Polynice Wadner
Represented By: Katherine Menendez(Designation Public Defender or Community Defender Appointment)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?