Unison Co., Ltd. v. Juhl Energy Development, Inc. et al
Unison Co., Ltd. |
Juhl Energy Development, Inc., Juhl Energy, Inc., Winona Wind Holdings, LLC, Winona County Wind, LLC, Daniel Juhl, John Mitola, John Brand, Bartly J. Loethen, Audrey Loethen and Jeff Bendel |
0:2013cv03342 |
December 5, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
XX Outside US |
Jeffrey J. Keyes |
Ann D. Montgomery |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 228 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 181 Plaintiff's Motion to Modify and Correct AAA Award; granting 211 Defendants' Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award; denying 214 Defendants' Motion for Attorney Fees (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 9/17/2018. (TLU) |
Filing 178 ORDER denying as premature 130 Defendants' Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award; denying as premature 148 Defendants' Motion for Attorney Fees; denying as moot 163 Plaintiff's Motion for Continuance (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 6/11/2018. (TLU) |
Filing 79 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying without prejudice 40 Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 50 Plaitiff's Motion to Stay Pending Appeal (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 6/6/2014. (TLU) |
Filing 46 ORDER denying 24 Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 04/07/2014. (TLU) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.