United States of America v. $138,121.00 in U.S. Currency

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Minnesota District Court United States of America v. $138,121.00 in U.S. Currency

United States of America v. $138,121.00 in U.S. Currency

Plaintiff:	United States of America
Defendant:	$138,121.00 in U.S. Currency
Case Number:	0:2014cv00198
Filed:	January 21, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office:	DMN Office
County:	Hennepin
Presiding Judge:	Michael J. Davis
Presiding Judge:	Franklin L. Noel
Nature of Suit:	Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action:	21 U.S.C. § 881
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 28, 2014	Filing 9 DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The motion of the United States for a default judgment and final order of forfeiture 5 is GRANTED; 2.A default judgment is entered against Robert L . Casteel and all unknown persons and entities having an interest in the defendant currency for failure to file a verified statement of interest in or right against the defendant currency and an answer to the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem as required by 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(4)(A) and (B), and Rule G(5) of the Supplemental Rules For Admiralty Or Maritime Claims And Asset Forfeiture Actions; and 3. The defendant $138,121.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY is forfeited to the United States pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6) for disposition in accordance with law. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.(Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 5/28/14. (GRR)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 28, 2014

Filing 9 DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The motion of the United States for a default judgment and final order of forfeiture 5 is GRANTED; 2.A default judgment is entered against Robert L . Casteel and all unknown persons and entities having an interest in the defendant currency for failure to file a verified statement of interest in or right against the defendant currency and an answer to the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem as required by 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(4)(A) and (B), and Rule G(5) of the Supplemental Rules For Admiralty Or Maritime Claims And Asset Forfeiture Actions; and 3. The defendant $138,121.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY is forfeited to the United States pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6) for disposition in accordance with law. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.(Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 5/28/14. (GRR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. $138,121.00 in U.S. Currency
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: $138,121.00 in U.S. Currency
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By:	James S Alexander
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?