Hood Packaging Corporation v. Steinwagner
||Hood Packaging Corporation
||July 22, 2014
||US District Court for the District of Minnesota
||XX US, Outside State
||Michael J. Davis
||Franklin L. Noel
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 16, 2015
MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Defendant Brian Steinwagner's Motion to Vacate, Amend or Clarify the Preliminary Injunction 91 is GRANTED.(Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 3/16/15. (GRR)
|September 9, 2014
MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Hood Packaging Corporation's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction 13 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; 2. Steinwagner may continue to work for M orris Packaging provided that he does not compete against Hood with respect to any of Steinwagner's former accounts at Hood, or the accounts held by Hood on the date of Steinwagner's resignation; 3. Steinwagner is enjoined from communic ating, disclosing, divulging or furnishing any of Hood Packaging Corporation's non-public, confidential information, including information related to specific manufacturing equipment used by Hood, bids undertaken by Hood, Hood's customer sa les forecast data, and intangible property, to any person, firm, corporation, association, or other entity for any reason or purpose whatsoever; 4. Steinwagner shall return any of Hood Packaging's confidential or proprietary information in h is possession and control, including, but not limited to, electronic documents and files; and 5. Steinwagner shall preserve all documents, data and information related to Hood Packaging, including but not limited to electronic documents, electroni c mail, and corporate documents. 6. This Order is effective upon the date recited below and shall remain in effect until the earlier of June 5, 2015, or further order of this Court. The Court will not require security under Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Steinwagner is not ordered to end his employment at Morris Packaging. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 9/9/14. (GRR)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?