Hood Packaging Corporation v. Steinwagner
Plaintiff: Hood Packaging Corporation
Defendant: Brian Steinwagner
Case Number: 0:2014cv02979
Filed: July 22, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Davis
Presiding Judge: Franklin L. Noel
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 136 MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Defendant Brian Steinwagner's Motion to Vacate, Amend or Clarify the Preliminary Injunction 91 is GRANTED.(Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 3/16/15. (GRR)
September 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 40 MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Hood Packaging Corporation's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction 13 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; 2. Steinwagner may continue to work for M orris Packaging provided that he does not compete against Hood with respect to any of Steinwagner's former accounts at Hood, or the accounts held by Hood on the date of Steinwagner's resignation; 3. Steinwagner is enjoined from communic ating, disclosing, divulging or furnishing any of Hood Packaging Corporation's non-public, confidential information, including information related to specific manufacturing equipment used by Hood, bids undertaken by Hood, Hood's customer sa les forecast data, and intangible property, to any person, firm, corporation, association, or other entity for any reason or purpose whatsoever; 4. Steinwagner shall return any of Hood Packaging's confidential or proprietary information in h is possession and control, including, but not limited to, electronic documents and files; and 5. Steinwagner shall preserve all documents, data and information related to Hood Packaging, including but not limited to electronic documents, electroni c mail, and corporate documents. 6. This Order is effective upon the date recited below and shall remain in effect until the earlier of June 5, 2015, or further order of this Court. The Court will not require security under Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Steinwagner is not ordered to end his employment at Morris Packaging. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 9/9/14. (GRR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hood Packaging Corporation v. Steinwagner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hood Packaging Corporation
Represented By: George H Norris
Represented By: Mary M L O'Brien
Represented By: John E Radmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Steinwagner
Represented By: Timothy D Kelly
Represented By: Jared D Kemper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?