Clark v. Roy et al
Courtney Bernard Clark |
Tom Roy, Nannette Larson, Schmult, Centurion of Minnesota, Stephen Craane, Kathy Reid, David Reishus and Katherine Powers |
0:2015cv02778 |
June 23, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Washington |
Hildy Bowbeer |
Michael J. Davis |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 408 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER overruling Plaintiff's Objections [Doc. No. 406]; affirming Magistrate Judge Bowbeer's April 12, 2019 Order; denying Plaintiff's Motion to be Transferred to a Safe Facility [Doc. No. 404] and denying Plaintiff's Request for an Attorney [Doc. No. 407]. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 5/10/2019. (SMD) |
Filing 395 ORDER denying 390 Motion to Order Defendants to Compensate Plaintiff for Loss Property; granting 393 Application on Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal(Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 01/22/2018. (SMD) cc: Courtney Bernard Clark and prison authorities. Modified text on 1/22/2018 (MMP). |
Filing 292 ORDER denying 289 Plaintiff's Objection to the Court's order of 01/11/17, which this Court construes as a motion for reconsideration (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 01/23/17. (MJC) (cc: Clark) Modified on 1/23/2017 (AKL). |
Filing 288 ORDER ruling that Plaintiff's Objection [Doc. No. 284] to the November 28, 2016 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer is SUSTAINED in part as to Plaintiff's photographs and OVERRULED in part in all other respects; The November 28, 2016 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer [Doc. No. 270] is ADOPTED; Plaintiff's "Motion for Compensation Relief or Reimbursement of Property, Commissary Taken. Also School Time and Pay Compensations&qu ot; [Doc. No. 147] is DENIED; Plaintiff's "Motion for a[n] Order That Defendants Reimburse Plaintiff Clark for All Property, Canteen, Pictures, that Was Destroyed, Not Allowed, or Missing under the D.O.C. Control, MN and North Dakota" [Doc. No. 171] is DENIED; Plaintiff's Objection [Doc. No. 285] to the November 30, 2016 Order of Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer is OVERRULED; The November 30, 2016 Order of Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer [Doc. No. 272] is AFFIRMED; and Plaintif f's "Motion for Modification to Release Order and Objection to Release All of the Plaintiff Clark Medical Files" [Doc. No. 261] is DENIED. To the extent that Plaintiff has not already done so, he must sign the authorization for the release of his medical records and return the signed form to counsel for Centurion and Dr. Craane no later than January 27, 2017. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 01/11/17. (MJC) |
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court DECLINES TO ADOPT the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer dated August 11, 2015 14 . 2. Within 20 days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff C ourtney Bernard Clark is ordered to file proof with this Court that a) Plaintiff has requested that prison officials remit the partial filing fee to this Court as soon as money is deposited into his account; and b) Plaintiff has informed pris on officials that, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2), they must "forward payments from the prisoners account to the clerk of court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the filing fees are paid." (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 9/28/15. (GRR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.