H.F.S. Properties, LLP v. Foot Locker Specialty, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Minnesota District Court H.F.S. Properties, LLP v. Foot Locker Specialty, Inc.

H.F.S. Properties, LLP v. Foot Locker Specialty, Inc.

Plaintiff:	H.F.S. Properties, LLP
Defendant:	Foot Locker Specialty, Inc.
Case Number:	0:2015cv03273
Filed:	August 13, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office:	DMN Office
County:	Ramsey
Presiding Judge:	Michael J. Davis
Presiding Judge:	Steven E. Rau
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 8, 2017	Filing 51 MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: HFS's Letter Request to File a Motion for Reconsideration 48 is DENIED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 3/8/17. (GRR)
February 2, 2017	Filing 47 MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Foot Locker Specialty, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 25 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: a. Foot Locker's motion for summary judgment on Count Two: N egligence is DENIED. b. Foot Locker's motion for summary judgment on Count Three: Waste is DENIED. c. Foot Locker's motion for summary judgment on Count Four: Declaratory Judgment is DENIED. d. Foot Locker's motion for summ ary judgment on Count One: Breach of Contract to the extent it is based on the application of the statute of limitations to Article 2 of the 1920 Lease is DENIED. e. Foot Locker's request for an order that H.F.S. is responsible for bringing t he Woolworth Building into compliance with current building codes following termination of the Leases is GRANTED. f. Foot Locker's request for an order that, under Articles 7 and 8 of the 1949 Lease, Foot Locker is not responsible for repair or replacement costs associated with the Woolworth Building's interior walls, mechanical systems, electrical systems, or other fixtures, equipment, or moveable machinery in the Building is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature. g. Foot Loc ker's request for an order that the diminution in value is the proper measure of damage for the breach of contract claim is DENIED. 2. H.F.S. Properties' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 30 is GRANTED as follows: the Court strikes Foot Locker's affirmative defense of economic waste and holds that the applicable measure of damages for Count One is the reasonable cost to complete the repairs required under the Leases. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 2/2/17. (GRR)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 8, 2017

Filing 51 MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: HFS's Letter Request to File a Motion for Reconsideration 48 is DENIED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 3/8/17. (GRR)

February 2, 2017

Filing 47 MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Foot Locker Specialty, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 25 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: a. Foot Locker's motion for summary judgment on Count Two: N egligence is DENIED. b. Foot Locker's motion for summary judgment on Count Three: Waste is DENIED. c. Foot Locker's motion for summary judgment on Count Four: Declaratory Judgment is DENIED. d. Foot Locker's motion for summ ary judgment on Count One: Breach of Contract to the extent it is based on the application of the statute of limitations to Article 2 of the 1920 Lease is DENIED. e. Foot Locker's request for an order that H.F.S. is responsible for bringing t he Woolworth Building into compliance with current building codes following termination of the Leases is GRANTED. f. Foot Locker's request for an order that, under Articles 7 and 8 of the 1949 Lease, Foot Locker is not responsible for repair or replacement costs associated with the Woolworth Building's interior walls, mechanical systems, electrical systems, or other fixtures, equipment, or moveable machinery in the Building is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature. g. Foot Loc ker's request for an order that the diminution in value is the proper measure of damage for the breach of contract claim is DENIED. 2. H.F.S. Properties' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 30 is GRANTED as follows: the Court strikes Foot Locker's affirmative defense of economic waste and holds that the applicable measure of damages for Count One is the reasonable cost to complete the repairs required under the Leases. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 2/2/17. (GRR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: H.F.S. Properties, LLP v. Foot Locker Specialty, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: H.F.S. Properties, LLP
Represented By:	Stuart T Alger
Represented By:	Scott G Harris
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Foot Locker Specialty, Inc.
Represented By:	Kyle R Hardwick
Represented By:	James J Hartnett, IV
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?