Mason et al v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
| Ricky Lee Mason and Ryan Richard Swenson |
| Minnesota Department of Human Services, Emily Johnson-Piper, Kevin Moser, 2015 - Present Data Practices Official of Minnesota Sex Offender Program as Doe No. 1, 2015 - Present Minnesota Department of Human Services Data practices Official as Doe No. 2 and Present Health Information Management Services (HIMS) Department and its assigned agents, employees as Doe No. 3 |
| 0:2016cv02340 |
| July 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Carlton |
| Leo I. Brisbois |
| John R. Tunheim |
| Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 15 Motion to Dismiss/General, filed by 2015 - Present Minnesota Department of Human Services Data practices Official as Doe No. 2, 2015 - Present Data Practices Official of Minnesota Sex Offender Program as Doe No. 1, Minnesota Department of Human Services, Kevin Moser, Present Health Information Management Services (HIMS) Department and its assigned agents, employees as Doe No. 3, Emily Johnson-Piper. Plainitiff's claims are dismissed. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on April 28, 2017. (HAZ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
