Jones v. Roy
Petitioner: Joshua Anthony Jones
Respondent: Tom Roy
Case Number: 0:2016cv03696
Filed: October 27, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: Hildy Bowbeer
Presiding Judge: Joan N. Ericksen
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 19 . (1) Respondent's motion to dismiss 11 is GRANTED. (2) Petitioner's § 2254 petition 1 is DISMISSED. (3) A certificate of appealability is DENIED. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on August 25, 2017. (CBC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Roy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Joshua Anthony Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Tom Roy
Represented By: James B Early
Represented By: Matthew Frank
Represented By: Linda Kay Jenny
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?