Masri v. Watson
Petitioner: Shaker Masri
Respondent: T J Watson
Case Number: 0:2016cv04132
Filed: December 12, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Pine
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Davis
Presiding Judge: Franklin L. Noel
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 17 Report and Recommendation (Written Opinion). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for a writ of habeas corpus 1 is DENIED without prejudice. LET JUDGEMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 3/24/17. (KMW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Masri v. Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Shaker Masri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: T J Watson
Represented By: David W Fuller
Represented By: Ana H Voss
Represented By: D Gerald Wilhelm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?