Tusen v. M&T Bank
Plaintiff: Gregg A. Tusen
Defendant: M&T Bank Corporation
Case Number: 0:2016cv04339
Filed: December 22, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Freeborn
Presiding Judge: Paul A. Magnuson
Presiding Judge: Franklin L. Noel
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 63 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant M&T's Motion to Dismiss 29 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and 2. Counts II and III of Tusen's Fourth Amended Complaint 54 are DISMISSED with prejudice as to Defendant M&T. (Written Opinion) Signed by The Hon. Paul A. Magnuson on 10/31/2017. (LLM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tusen v. M&T Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregg A. Tusen
Represented By: Jon E. Stanek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M&T Bank Corporation
Represented By: Ronn B Kreps
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?