Rodriguez v. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
Plaintiff: Arnik Mauricio Rodriguez
Defendant: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
Case Number: 0:2017cv00664
Filed: March 2, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Ramsey
Presiding Judge: Leo I. Brisbois
Presiding Judge: Susan Richard Nelson
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER adopting 15 Report and Recommendation. This action is dismissed without prejudice (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 05/30/2017. (SMD) cc: Plaintiff. Modified on 5/30/2017 (lmb).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arnik Mauricio Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
Represented By: Peter Baatrup
Represented By: John E Yanish
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?