Smith v. Bradley Pizza, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Scott Smith
Defendant: Bradley Pizza, Inc. and Pamela M Dahl
Case Number: 0:2017cv02032
Filed: June 14, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Dakota
Presiding Judge: Katherine M. Menendez
Presiding Judge: Wilhelmina M. Wright
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 254 OPINION AND ORDER denying 245 Plaintiff Scott Smith's Motion for Review of Taxation of Costs. See Order for additional details and specifics. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Eric C. Tostrud on 12/6/2019. (RMM)
September 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 242 ORDER in Response to 230 Letter to Magistrate Judge. See Order for details. (Written Opinion). Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 9/13/2019. (BJP)
June 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 228 OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants' motion for summary judgment and to exclude expert testimony 166 is GRANTED IN PART for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and in all other respects is DENIED as moot, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgmen t and to exclude evidence 184 is DENIED as moot, Plaintiff's objection 165 to the 11/13/18 Order 159 is OVERRULED and that Order is AFFIRMED, Plaintiff's objection 226 to the 2/04/2019 Order 221 is OVERRULED and that Order is AFFIRMED, and the action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Eric C. Tostrud on 6/12/2019. (RMM) Modified text on 6/12/2019 (RMM).
February 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 221 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 196 Motion for Sanctions(Written Opinion). See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 2/4/2019. (BJP)
November 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 159 ORDER denying 138 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 144 Motion to Compel. See Order for details. (Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 11/13/2018. (BJP)
August 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 131 ORDER in Response to 127 Letter to Magistrate Judge, 126 Letter to Magistrate Judge. Defendants' request to compel a site inspection is DENIED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 8/23/2018. (BJP)
June 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 107 ORDER denying 74 Motion for Sanctions(Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 6/4/2018. (BJP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Bradley Pizza, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott Smith
Represented By: Padraigin Browne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bradley Pizza, Inc.
Represented By: Edward Peter Sheu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pamela M Dahl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?